Which Sentence Has A Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement Error

Since it is not known who had to go to the hospital, the sentence should be rewritten: identify the choice of the answer that best improves the highlighted part of the sentence. This sentence has a pronoun that does not correspond to its predecessor. “It” is unique, but refers to the plural “chickens” and “dinosaurs.” The corrected sentence is: “Modern chickens did not evolve with prehistoric dinosaurs, but they have a common ancestor.” The written sentence contains a small error. It, a singular pronoun, is used to refer to the plural “sporting events.” To solve this problem, the pronoun must be made in the plural, which is done in “Most men who go to sporting events, they find a pleasant change”. The first part of the sentence introduces the spider as a unique nostunin. The second part, in which the whole uses pronouns, should match this by referring to the spider with singular pronouns. The corrected sentence is: “The tree-toothed spider goes from the Amazon to the north, where it had its home.” Pronouns must also have a clear precursor. Sometimes, however, a sentence seems to have two possible precursors. If so, rewrite the sentence. Take a look at the following false sentence, which has an ambiguous pronouner reference: it must be a Nostun or a pronoun in the sentence that can act as a precursor.

Pronouns, this, this, and this can lead to a vague pronoun, if they refer to something that was previously mentioned in another sentence: the pronoun “sound” is often used with indeterminate individual pronouns, but this is not always formally correct. Here is an example that shows a pronoun-antecedent chord error: replace the highlighted part with the selection of answers that leads to a clear, precise sentence and consistent with the requirements of standard english font. One of the answer options reproduces the highlighted part as written in the sentence. The use of “your” at the end of the sentence is confusing, because the only indication in the sentence is “one person” and the second pronoun of the person has no place in the sentence. Changing “your” to a third pronoun of the possessive person will solve this problem. Since we do not know if the “person” in question is a man or a woman, we should use the phrase “his or her.” The correct answer is therefore “for the rest of his life.” In this sentence, the plural pronoun “sie” does not correspond to its unique predecessor, the “woolly mammoth.” The corrected sentence is: “The woolly mammoth, a relative of the elephant, crossed northern Eurasia and North America before its extinction.” Here are nine pronoun-antecedent agreement rules.